Sunday, April 10, 2011

Saturday, February 19, 2011

YouTube - matheis's Channel

YouTube - matheis's Channel
G. Edward Griffin interviews Norman Dodds
#1 of 6 parts
Dodds was the chief investigator of the tax-exempt foundations, aka, the Reece Committee

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

American Thinker Blog: Soros's CAP gives Obama his marching orders to subvert the will of the people

American Thinker Blog: Soros's CAP gives Obama his marching orders to subvert the will of the people

Citizen Soros: Manipulating the Media (Part 1 in a Series)

Citizen Soros: Manipulating the Media (Part 1 in a Series)

Cocoon Is an All-In-One Privacy Extension for Firefox (And We've Got Beta Invites)

Bye-Bye Googling....Hello Cocooning!!!


Cocoon Is an All-In-One Privacy Extension for Firefox (And We've Got Beta Invites)

James M. Lindsay: The Water's Edge » Blog Archive » Congressional Constants

A view from the elites at CFR




James M. Lindsay: The Water's Edge » Blog Archive » Congressional Constants

Obama: ‘If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun’

Mobster wisdom tells us never to bring a knife to a gun fight. But what does political wisdom say about bringing a gun to a knife fight?
That’s exactly what Barack Obama said he would do to counter Republican attacks “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. “Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/06/14/obama-if-they-bring-a-knife-to-the-fight-we-bring-a-gun/

Free Speech in the Crosshairs

Free Speech in the Crosshairs
Excerpt:
The bitter, pinched personality of the hardcore progressive is the seedbed of political violence in our nation today.  I've written previously about the revolutionary intentions of the left in this country, and just a few days ago, the high priestess of leftist agitation, Francis Fox Piven, called for "violent...bloody revolution."  Republicans need to get ahead of the coming slander.  Let your congressperson know that you won't tolerate your freedom of speech being limited because of the actions of a madman, or by the design of media/political charlatans.

Oddities regarding Christina Green ..9 yr. old victim of Tucson Tragedy

So odd that little Christina was born on the tragic day of:   9/11/01  ...... and dies on the tragic day of   1/9/11.

Statement by NRA Concerning Tucson Tragedy

The National Rifle Association, the nation’s largest pro-gun lobbying group, posted the following statement [13] on its Web site: “Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims of this senseless tragedy, including Representative Gabrielle Giffords, and their families during this difficult time. We join the rest of the country in praying for the quick recovery of those injured."
Asked whether the repeal of gun restrictions played a role in the shooting, the group’s spokesman told Politico [14]: “Anything other than prayers for the victims and their families at this time would be inappropriate.”
http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/in-gun-control-debate-more-than-one-issue-at-play

just a conservative girl: See Americans Can See the Truth - Not Buying the Lefts Blame Game

just a conservative girl: See Americans Can See the Truth - Not Buying the Lefts Blame Game
A new poll is out today that the majority of Americans have rejected the falsehoods that were spewed over the past few days about the shooting of Congresswoman Giffords.  The largest portion of people who did believe the spin were democrats:

Overall, 57 percent of respondents said the harsh political tone had nothing to do with the shooting, compared to 32 percent who felt it did. Republicans were more likely to feel the two were unrelated - 69 percent said rhetoric was not to blame; 19 percent said it played a part. Democrats were more split on the issue - 49 percent saw no connection; 42 percent said there was.


Independents more closely reflected the overall breakdown - 56 percent said rhetoric had nothing to do with the attack; 33 percent felt it did.

Obama's Internet Plan Sounds an Awful Lot Like a National Internet ID

Obama's Internet Plan Sounds an Awful Lot Like a National Internet ID 
According to Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, as reported by CNET:
"We are not talking about a national ID card. We are not talking about a government-controlled system. What we are talking about is enhancing online security and privacy, and reducing and perhaps even eliminating the need to memorize a dozen passwords, through creation and use of more trusted digital identities."
We are talking about a government-controlled system. That is exactly what we are talking about. In fact, the presentation of what few facts exist is vague enough as to be good for nothing but worry.

Internet Identity System Said Readied by Obama Administration - BusinessWeek

Internet Identity System Said Readied by Obama Administration - BusinessWeek

Friday, January 7, 2011

This is Why There Are No Jobs In America

I received this in an email from a friend...Good read!


This Is Why There Are No Jobs in America By Porter Stansberry November 18, 2010

I'd like to make you a business offer. Seriously. This is a real offer. In fact, you really can't turn me down, as you'll come to understand in a moment...

Here's the deal. You're going to start a business or expand the one you've got now. It doesn't really matter what you do or what you're going to do. I'll partner with you no matter what business you're in - as long as it's legal.

But I can't give you any capital - you have to come up with that on your own. I won't give you any labor - that's definitely up to you. What I will do, however, is demand you follow all sorts of rules about what products and services you can offer, how much (and how often) you pay your employees, and where and when you're allowed to operate your business. That's my role in the affair: to tell you what to do.

Now in return for my rules, I'm going to take roughly half of whatever you make in the business each year. Half seems fair, doesn't it? I think so. Of course, that's half of your profits.

You're also going to have to pay me about 12% of whatever you decide to pay your employees because you've got to cover my expenses for promulgating all of the rules about whom you can employ, when, where, and how. Come on, you're my partner. It's only "fair."

Now... after you've put your hard-earned savings at risk to start this
business, and after you've worked hard at it for a few decades (paying me my 50% or a bit more along the way each year), you might decide you'd like to cash out - to finally live the good life.

Whether or not this is "fair" - some people never can afford to retire - is a different argument. As your partner, I'm happy for you to sell whenever you'd like... because our agreement says, if you sell, you have to pay me an additional 20% of whatever the capitalized value of the business is at that time.

I know... I know... you put up all the original capital. You took all the
risks. You put in all of the labor. That's all true. But I've done my part,
too. I've collected 50% of the profits each year. And I've always come up with more rules for you to follow each year. Therefore, I deserve another, final 20% slice of the business.

Oh... and one more thing...

Even after you've sold the business and paid all of my fees... I'd recommend buying lots of life insurance. You see, even after you've been retired for years, when you die, you'll have to pay me 50% of whatever your estate is worth.

After all, I've got lots of partners and not all of them are as successful
as you and your family. We don't think it's "fair" for your kids to have
such a big advantage. But if you buy enough life insurance, you can finance this expense for your children.

All in all, if you're a very successful entrepreneur... if you're one of the rare, lucky, and hard-working people who can create a new company, employ lots of people, and satisfy the public... you'll end up paying me more than 75% of your income over your life. Thanks so much.

I'm sure you'll think my offer is reasonable and happily partner with me... but it doesn't really matter how you feel about it because if you ever try to stiff me - or cheat me on any of my fees or rules - I'll break down your door in the middle of the night, threaten you and your family with heavy, automatic weapons, and throw you in jail.

That's how civil society is supposed to work, right? This is America, isn't it? That's the offer America gives its entrepreneurs. And the idiots in Washington wonder why there are no new jobs...